Fluoroscopic Comparison of Cervical Spine Motion Using LMA CTrach, C-MAC Videolaryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
P: 44-50
February 2018

Fluoroscopic Comparison of Cervical Spine Motion Using LMA CTrach, C-MAC Videolaryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope

Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2018;46(1):44-50
1. Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Kocaeli University School of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey
2. Department of Radiology, Kocaeli University School of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey
3. Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain, Dumlupınar University, Kutahya, Turkey
4. Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Adatıp Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey
5. Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, İstinye University, İstanbul, Turkey
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 08.07.2017
Accepted Date: 17.10.2017
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objective:

Endotracheal intubation should be performed with care when cervical spine (C-spine) injury is suspected. The aim of this study was to evaluate the movement of the C-spine using fluoroscopy during intubation with Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) CTrach, C-MAC videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope.

Methods:

This was a single-centre, prospective, observational, controlled trial. In total, 22 surgical patients aged 18-65 years planned to undergo operation under general anaesthesia, were enrolled. X-ray images of the C-spine were obtained using fluoroscopy with the patients’ head in a neutral position. All patients underwent laryngoscopy using a Macintosh blade, LMA CTrach and C-MAC videolaryngoscope, and fluoroscopic images of the C-spine were obtained. All the patients were intubated at the last laryngoscopy simulation (using the C-MAC). The atlanto-occipital distance (AOD) and angles between C0 C1 , C0 C2 , C0 C3 , C0 C4 , C1 C2 and C2 C3 lines were measured and compared between each device.

Results:

The mean AOD was measured as 20.4 mm in a neutral position, which decreased to 13.1, 17.2 and 12.3 mm after the insertion of the Macintosh laryngoscope, LMA CTrach and C-MAC videolaryngoscope, respectively. The differences were significant (p<0.001). Moreover, significant difference was noted in C0 C2 , C0 C3 and C1 C2 angles with the insertion of the three devices (p<0.001). The LMA CTrach resulted in significantly lesser C-spine movements in C0 C2 , C0 C3 and C0 C4 angles compared to the Macintosh laryngoscope and C-MAC videolaryngoscope (p<0.001).

Conclusion:

The LMA CTrach resulted in lesser C-spine movements compared to Macintosh laryngoscope and C-MAC videolaryngoscope. In case of the C-spine injury, LMA CTrach may be preferred and may cause fewer traumas during endotracheal intubation.

Keywords: Cervical spine motion, LMA C Trach, videolaryngoscopy, fluoroscopy

References

2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House