Investigation of Effects of Epidural Anaesthesia Combined with General Anaesthesia on the Stress Response in Patients Undergoing Hip and Knee Arthroplasty
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
P: 154-161
June 2015

Investigation of Effects of Epidural Anaesthesia Combined with General Anaesthesia on the Stress Response in Patients Undergoing Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2015;43(3):154-161
1. Sağlık Bakanlığı Uşak Devlet Hastanesi, Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Kliniği, Uşak, Türkiye
2. Sağlık Bakanlığı Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Kliniği, Ankara, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 29.05.2014
Accepted Date: 12.08.2014
Publish Date: 16.02.2015
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objective:

To investigate the effects of general anaesthesia and general+epidural anaesthesia on the stress response which was evaluated with the adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH), cortisol, insulin, and glucose levels and the haemodynamic parameters.

Methods:

Forty two, American Society of Anesthesiologists physiologic status I-II, patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty were randomized into two groups; general anaesthesia (Group G) and general anaesthesia+epidural anaesthesia (Group E). Epidural anaesthesia: patients in Group E received epidural anaesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine, a lumbar epidural catheter was placed and after achieving sensorial block at T10 dermatome, general anaesthesia was commenced. General anaesthesia was standardized in both groups. Further, plasma ACTH, cortisol, insulin and glucose levels were determined at preoperative=t1, after the surgical incision=t2, postoperative 2nd hour=t3 and postoperative 24th hour=t4. Perioperative heart rate, blood pressures, pain scores and morphine consumption were also determined.

Results:

ACTH levels were higher in Group G than Group E [Group G, t2: 71.4±39.9 pg mL−1, t3: 578.6±566.1 pg mL−1, Group E, t2: 20.2±16.2 pg mL−1, t3: 56.3±73.6 pg mL−1 (p<0.001)]. Cortisol, was higher in Group G compared with Group E [Group G, t3: 33.4±13.1 µg dL−1, t4: 34.1±22.5 µg dL−1, Group E, t3: 19.1±10.3 µg dL−1, t4: 21.3±8.1 µg dL−1 (p=0.001 and p=0.002)]. The insulin levels were higher compared with the baseline values at t3, and glucose was higher at t3 and t4 in both groups. Haemodynamic parameters were stable in Group E, and pain scores and morphine consumption were higher in Group G than in Group E.

Conclusion:

Our results suggest that general anaesthesia combined with epidural anaesthesia suppressed the stress response, which was evaluated with ACTH, cortisol levels and haemodynamic parameters; however, this method was ineffective to attenuate the increase in glucose and insulin levels.

Keywords: ACTH, arthroplasty, epidural anaesthesia, cortisol, insulin, stress response

References

2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House