Postperfusion Syndrome in Cadaveric Liver Transplantations
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
P: 128-133
June 2016

Postperfusion Syndrome in Cadaveric Liver Transplantations

Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2016;44(3):128-133
1. Mersin Devlet Hastanesi, Anestezi Kliniği, Mersin, Türkiye
2. Türkiye Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim Araştırma Hastanesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Kliniği, Ankara, Türkiye
3. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye
4. Türkiye Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim Araştırma Hastanesi, Gastroenterolojik Cerrahi Kliniği, Ankara, Türkiye
5. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Kardiyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Sivas, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 11.06.2015
Accepted Date: 23.10.2015
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objective:

To evaluate the factors that affects the postperfusion syndrome in cadaveric liver transplantations and the effect of the postperfusion syndrome on discharge from the hospital.

Methods:

Patients who underwent cadaveric liver transplantations between 2007 and 2013 were scanned retrospectively. Intraoperative anaesthesia records, intensive care unit follow-up forms and discharge reports were examined from patient files. Overall, 43 patients having complete data were included in the study. The postperfusion syndrome is defined as asystoli or a decrease in mean arterial pressure of more than 30%, which occurred in the first 5 min of reperfusion and continued for 1 min. Patients were divided into two groups: those who had the postperfusion syndrome and those who did not.

Results:

The number of patients who had the postperfusion syndrome was 25 of 43 (58.1%). The MELD score of patients without the postperfusion syndrome was calculated as 16.9±3.2 and that of patients with the postperfusion syndrome was 19.7±3.6. A statistically significant relationship was detected between the postperfusion syndrome occurrence and a high MELD score (p=0.013). The diastolic blood pressure just before reperfusion was statistically lower in the group with the postperfusion syndrome than in the other group (p=0.023, 50±8 vs. 58±11). According to the logistic regression analysis, the MELD score and the decrease in diastolic blood pressure before reperfusion were defined as independent predictive factors.

Conclusion:

According to the study, the ratio for having the postperfusion syndrome was found to be 58.1%. The independent predictor factors affecting the postperfusion syndrome were detected as the MELD score and the decrease in diastolic blood pressure before reperfusion. The postperfusion syndrome during orthotropic liver transplantation is an important issue for anaesthesiologists. The awareness of the related factors with the postperfusion syndrome may help in the development of various preventive strategies.