The Effects of Different Methods Applied for the Protection of Myocardial and Brain Functions During Aortic Aneurysm Repair Surgery on the Prognosis and Survival
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Clinical Research
P: 234-245
August 2012

The Effects of Different Methods Applied for the Protection of Myocardial and Brain Functions During Aortic Aneurysm Repair Surgery on the Prognosis and Survival

Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2012;40(4):234-245
1. Kartal Koşuyolu Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Kliniği, İstanbul, Türkiye
2. Adıyaman Gölbaşı Devlet Hastanesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Kliniği
3. Yozgat Sorgun Devlet Hastanesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Kliniği
4. Kartal Koşuyolu Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Kardiyovasküler Cerrahi Kliniği
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 17.10.2011
Accepted Date: 11.02.2012
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objective:

Our aim was to investigate the relation between perioperative risk factors influencing mortality and different methods of surgical cannulation, temperature regulation and cerebral protection in patients undergoing aortic aneurysm repair surgery. For this purpose; patients requiring deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA), retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP) and femoral or aortic cannulation were compared with patients requiring axillary cannulation, moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest (MHCA) and selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (SACP).

Material and Methods:

110 consecutive patients undergoing aortic arch aneurysm repair surgery were divided into three groups in a prospective, nonrandomized study plan depending on surgical pathology, operation and anesthesia techniques. In Group 1, femoral cannulation, DHCA (22-25°C) and RSP ; in Group 2, axillary cannulation, MHCA (26-28°C) and SACP, whereas, in Group 3, aortic cannulation, DHCA and RCP were performed. Perioperative risk factors were investigated.

Results:

In comparison of three groups, mean cross- clamping and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) times (min) were different (Group 1; 75.62±26.28 ve144.15±66.71, Group 2; 60.57±26.32 and 109.09±45.38, Grup 3; 72.90±23.33 and 120.83±53.46 minutes respectively, p=0.021). The comparison of mortality rates showed; in Group 1; 10/34 (29.4 %), in Group 2; 3/47 (6.4 % ) and in Group 3; 3/29 (10.3 %) patients (p=0.011). Use of IABP, heart failure, atrial rythm disturbances were found to be independent risk factors for mortality (95 % confidence interval, Hosmer and Lemeshow test, chi square=5.71, and p=0.68).

Conclusion:

In patients undergoing aortic arch repair with MHCA, SCAP and axillary cannulation, lower rates of morbidity and mortality were observed in comparison to DHCA, RCP and femoral or aortic cannulation.

Keywords: Aortic aneurysm, deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest

References

2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House